It’s hard to take a victim seriously who laughs as she tells her story of “victimhood.”  Even though her voice broke briefly during the most explicit parts of the public statement, Sharon Bialek’s claims of sexual harassment by Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain were just another silly spectacle orchestrated by America’s most unscrupulous feminist attorney, Gloria Allred.

Why do I discount Bialek’s story?  I’ll answer with a few questions of my own. 

What was Bialek doing meeting Herman Cain in Washington, DC?  What did she hope to achieve by a face-to-face meeting?  She wouldn’t have been attempting to use her feminine “powers” on him, would she? If she were staying in New Jersey, why didn’t she make it a daytime meeting, not an over night visit?  Why do that with someone you know so slightly?

What was Herman Cain to think about a single woman making an unnecessary arrangement like that…agreeing to drinks and dinner on the basis of nothing more, according to her, than a few conversations at public dinners and receptions?

If Bialek were so traumatized and embarrassed, why did she eagerly seek him out at a recent Tea Party event in Chicago?  Amy Jacobson, co-host of morning drive on WIND Chicago, was witness to that encounter with Cain and described her as “hell bent” on getting back stage to see him.  Jacobson said Bialek “cornered him” and that her approach to Cain was “flirtatious.”

 If you are embarrassed by a sexual encounter, you don’t eagerly seek out the perpetrator to reconnect for a chat.  Unless you think the harasser might someday be president and you are imagining the connections that might come from that.

Why did she so carefully include the buzzwords of a harassment lawsuit? Herman Cain was “powerful,” she said,  “in a position of authority over me.”  Bialek was “shocked” that he would use his “power” in this way.  Does a sincerely abused person so carefully script their account?  Were there certain words she wanted to use?  This was not a court of law, but her statement was worded like a deposition.  She even described the clothing they wore…strange…unnecessary.

Why in one interaction did she say she was concerned for her thirteen-year-old son and the effect this would have on him and in another say she came forward because her son encouraged her to do so?  Did she tell her son about Cain’s sexual advances?  Why would she do that?  Wouldn’t that information be inappropriate and harmful enough to inflict on your young son without making it public?

Sharon Bialek has a history of financial trouble.  She has filed bankruptcy twice and charged a former boyfriend with harassment for trying to get her to pay back money he loaned her.  A Chicago friend is quoted as describing her as a “complete gold digger.”  When asked if she hoped to benefit financially from her fourteen year old accusation of Cain, she deftly replied, “It was not my intention,” eagerly adding that she had not paid Allred any fee for her services.  One has to ask, who IS paying Allred?  Bialek lives in the same building as Obama Political Advisor, David Axelrod.  At this point anything is possible.

This is a sordid and slimy accusation.  Bialek can say anything and the media will print and reprint it regardless of its veracity. Allred gets another moment in the sun…more clients…more money and you can bet Miss Bialek will get something for her troubles as well.   And the dirt will stick to Cain no matter his response.

It’s telling that by her own account, she was not offended by Cain’s actions, only that he did what he did knowing she had a boyfriend.  Are we to conclude it would otherwise have been fine? 

Am I excusing Herman Cain?  No.  But if he did what she said he did and she in turn flirted inappropriately, it is NOT sexual harassment, it is what happens every day in our sex-obsessed, morally bankrupt culture. 

If Cain did what she said he did, he is guilty of faithlessness to his wife, his family and the God he says he serves.  If there is any credible basis upon which she can be believed, that’s the criteria on which to judge Herman Cain.

This entry was posted in Articles. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Mary Ellen Fitzgibbons says:


    Let’s face it. This is what the Far Left does best: smear. You were the one who reported that as soon as Sarah Palin was nominated that Barack Obama sent 30-40 attorneys marching into Alaska to dig for as much dirt as they can find on her. All this tells me that the one most feared by Obama is Cain. Can’t you imagine Obama v. Cain in a debate!!!! Then, the African-Americans in his “back pocket” suddenly would have a real choice.

    First off, I was suspicious about the mysterious “3″ — I read on a blog somewhere that Emanuel had his fingerprints on that. When I saw Bialek used to live in Axelrod’s building, that solidified my theory. Of course, Emanuel and Axelrod will not make direct contact. This is Chicago — machine politics, back room deals, connections & “shake downs.” But, it is also 21st century more sophisticated politics. I would not be surprised if a contact person did not hand her an envelope w/some cash to fly to NY. Yes, why does she need to fly to NYC for a press conference? She could have one on her front lawn in Libertyville. But, in NYC she has access to more press & publishers there that would be relentlessly seeking her out once that news broke.

    “Innocent ’til proven guilty” is long gone on this issue. Who/why do folks automatically assume she is credible? What proof do they have of her integrity?
    How do we know she was not the aggressor and rebuffed by him? And, maybe “hell hath no fury but that of a woman’s scorn.” Maybe this is “payback”–revenge pent up for 14 years. Do we know if she is a marijuana user? Many are today. She has been bankrupt 2 times for some reason–the first filing apparently did not solve the problem. And, we don’t know if the 2nd one is solving the problem. If she has ever used even recreationally, her brain cells are vulnerable to being altered. We do not know about him on that nor do we know about how both tolerate alcohol.

    Yes, to “run after” Cain at Tea Con and then to have the audacity to say that she did not even know he would be there!!!!! I would have loved to attend, but w/my fixed SS income it was not prudent that I do. Even I knew Cain was going to be there.
    A caller in to one of the WIND talk shows said she attended Tea Con & that it was “all over” that Cain would be there. I don’t think Bialek bargained that anyone like Amy would report what she saw. After an alleged “assault”, for Bialek to go up, whisper in his ear & hug him also tells me she is capable of some form of aggression toward a male even without a relationship. And, for Bialek to tell no one even her fiance with whom she lives in Libertyville tells me that she is capable of disconnect.

    For me, I would not even agree to a dinner with a married man, drinks & ask for a job.
    Years ago a mob fellow was visiting his cousin where I worked as Secretary/Bookkeeper. I occupied the frong desk next to which was a chair where the mobster sat down. He asked me, “What kind of gifts do you like?” I said, “I don’t like any gifts.” That ended it; that was my intent. I don’t think Sharon Bialek would do the same.

    The other thing re: those 2 bankruptcies — why is she bankrupt? Maybe a long-shot–but, could it be for drinking? drugs? gambling? I don’t believe she has been married. She has at least 1 child. I thought it was 2. I say all that to say that there could be motivation to receive nice cash envelopes in her mail box. Who would ever know?

    Today women are not like they were years ago. At least that is what I hear from fellows. Even some women tell me. Women have been “liberated” and are more aggressive sexually. We also do not know if this woman tells facts objectively or if she is one who embellishes facts or even lies. I have seen folks like right through their teeth and look you square in the eye.

    Our freedoms and liberties are at stake in this election at many levels like they have never been before. Satan and the Far Left have a vested interest to deliver a “knock out” blow to Obama’s biggest threat. It will get uglier, more wicked & violent. I believe that even many will try to block voters from voting.

    Bless you. Miss you.

    Mary Ellen Fitzgibbons

  2. Mary Ellen Fitzgibbons says:

    I saw in one of Tuesday’s articles on the internet that Bialek has a 2nd interview @ WIND AM radio – Chicago!!!!! I hope WIND is “smart enough” not to get “mixed up in that. However, the new talk show host at 5 PM is Steve Cochran who will be interviewing Bialek & I think he said the attorney Allred.–!! He said he knows Bialek & believes her. (I cannot get adjusted to his show.) So, maybe the station is leaning Republican vs. Conservative in its organizaitonn
    Mary Ellen

  3. Ill wind blowing says:

    Hear this, Sandy Rios, and fail to understand.

    “He who troubles his own house will inherit the wind,
    And the fool will be servant to the wise of heart.”

    Proverbs 11:29 — New King James Version

  4. Christine Rickard says:

    Excellent piece Sandy. I agree that there is more to this than meets the eye. I’m curious just how Gloria Allred got involved to begin with??? In Bialek’s own testimony, I’m curious why she didn’t tell Mr Cain right from the initial contact, just what she was seeking. It sounded seductive to me as well. Regardless, the media will see to it that Herman Cain is destroyed. Just where is Jackson and Sharpton on all of this?

  5. Mary Ellen Fitzgibbons says:

    Check out Ann Coulter’s article “David Axelrod’s Pattern of Sexual Misbehavior,” at WND today 11/09/11:
    Satan’s tactics always have a pattern over time. He is not creative like the Holy Spirit.

    Mary Ellen Fitzgibbons
    Chicago, IL

  6. Larry Uloth says:

    this is one of the reasons I have discontinued reading all papers except for local news. so obviously the chicago boys club. it is going tobe a very long and nasty year until Nov. 2012.

Leave a Reply